1 |
There is a "dohtml" command available in ebuild scripts for just this |
2 |
purpose. I think you should feel free to file bugs against any ebuild |
3 |
that installs html files in compressed form. |
4 |
|
5 |
--Chouser |
6 |
|
7 |
Sebastian Werner wrote: [Tue Feb 19 2002, 3:57:03AM EST] |
8 |
> You are right. Leave all directories which contains html-documentation |
9 |
> without compression or put all files in one tar file and compress this |
10 |
> file. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Greetings |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Sebastian |
15 |
> |
16 |
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- |
17 |
> Von: gentoo-dev-admin@g.o [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@g.o] Im |
18 |
> Auftrag von Stefan Boresch |
19 |
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2002 09:04 |
20 |
> An: gentoo-dev@g.o |
21 |
> Betreff: [gentoo-dev] Gzipped HTML docs in /usr/share/doc |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I have recently stumbled across a lot of gzipped *.html *.htm |
24 |
> files in the /usr/share/doc hierarchy. I don't like it very much |
25 |
> since this breaks all navigation links. My question is: is this |
26 |
> intended, should I write bug reports, should I submit patches (provided |
27 |
> I figure out who is the 'culprit' for the compression (I suppose this is |
28 |
> a 'feature' of ebuild at some level) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Thanks, |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Stefan Boresch |
33 |
> |
34 |
> PS: Assuming that the compression of documentation is done |
35 |
> semi-automatically by ebuild, might it not be the easiest to either |
36 |
> exclude htm(l) pages from compression, or make the behavior user |
37 |
> controllable...? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> _______________________________________________ |
43 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
44 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
45 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
46 |
> |
47 |
> _______________________________________________ |
48 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
49 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
50 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |