Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:39:57
Message-Id: 20030523113957.GA1617@Daikan.pandora.be
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes by Georgi Georgiev
1 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:13:19PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
2 > People don't submit ebuilds all too often anyway.
3
4 http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=regexp&short_desc=new.*%28ebuild%7Cpackage%29&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=1&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
5
6 New ebuilds in the last day (yes, 1 day): 33 bugs found. Perhaps 3 of them
7 aren't really new ebuilds but just matched the regexp.
8
9 Wkr,
10 Sven Vermeulen
11 Gentoo Documentation
12
13 --
14 Thanks to DRM, you know that something has been built in environment of
15 unspecified degree of security, from source you cannot check, written by
16 programmers you don't know, released after passing QA of unknown quality and
17 which is released under a license that disclaims any responsibility...