Archives
Archives
| From: | Dan Naumov <jago@×××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. | ||
| Date: | Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:58:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20020817200303.4ebd74ab.jago@telefragged.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. by Bart Verwilst |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:50:26 +0200 |
| 2 | Bart Verwilst <verwilst@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > quakeforge-0.5.0_pre020817.ebuild |
| 5 | |
| 6 | That won't work with hourly auto-generated snapshots in the case where older snapshots are no longer kept on the server, just like our quakeforge case. This would require hourly auto-generated ebuilds and the borkage I mentioned in my previous mails would still exist :| |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Dan Naumov aka Jago |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. | mike <vapier@×××××××.com> |