Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Bart Verwilst <verwilst@g.o>
To: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@×××××××.net>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice.
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:50:35
Message-Id: 200208171850.29925.verwilst@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. by Jeremiah Mahler
1 Ok, i have NO idea what this thread is about, i just glanced at this, and i'll
2 give ya my suggestion, that's it :o)
3
4 || But suppose someone did want an ebuild for the hourly CVS snapshots?
5 || How should it be named?
6 ||
7 || quakeforge-0.5.0.ebuild # works, but is misleading
8 || quakeforge-0.5.0-cvs.ebuild # ERR!
9 || quakeforge-0.5.0_cvs.ebuild # ERR!
10 || quakeforge-0.5.0_cvs_hourly.ebuild # ERR!
11 || quakeforge-0.5.0_beta1.ebuild # OK, but misleading also
12 || ???
13 ||
14
15 quakeforge-0.5.0_pre020817.ebuild
16
17 :o)
18
19 See ya
20
21 --
22 Bart Verwilst
23 Gentoo Linux Developer, Release Coordinator
24 Gent, Belgium

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. Dan Naumov <jago@×××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice. Charles Lacour <gentoo-dev@×××××××.com>