| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Matthew Marlowe wrote: |
| 5 |
> They didn't know how they could do |
| 6 |
> this to gentoo based on the fact that one person's gentoo was different than anothers. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
So is one person's Red Hat from another's, if they're updating their |
| 9 |
systems using RHN. Perhaps to a lesser extent, but it is the case. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
At least one company I know of has certified specific versions of its |
| 12 |
software on Gentoo rather than certifying Gentoo as a whole, and that in |
| 13 |
general sounds like the best solution for us. If profiling is the best |
| 14 |
implementation of that on our side, so be it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> 1) Mysql binaries are compiled with icc which could provide significant performance gains for the targeted user base. |
| 17 |
> Untill icc is fully compatible with portage, I'd rather avoid installing icc myself on customer boxes. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I am really not a fan of this. What is the problem with icc and portage |
| 20 |
right now? Set CC=icc and compile away. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Perhaps this situation could be fixed rather than adding a hack to work |
| 23 |
around it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Donnie |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFCaZ2XXVaO67S1rtsRAn4UAKDewYJR+FVtcnblPyUrr42UFMiNDgCg1jvV |
| 31 |
tYYBN72BWv7tg0IzCxAxQ9Y= |
| 32 |
=GaQ7 |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives