| 1 |
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:33, Robert Cole wrote: |
| 2 |
> Someone in this thread said that ACCEPT_KEYWORDS isn't for unstable |
| 3 |
> ebuilds/packages. If that's the case we don't need ACCEPT_KEYWORDS do we? I |
| 4 |
> must have it wrong that things go from masked to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to the |
| 5 |
> stable tree route. I'll do more reading and educate myself as to what |
| 6 |
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is for and why apps are flagged that way. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is for testing *ebuilds* not for testing packages. A |
| 9 |
packages stability/lack thereof has little to do with its KEYWORDS. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, there are many packages in the tree which would be considered |
| 12 |
"unstable", such as the beta KDE or the development-sources, but those |
| 13 |
are generally left unsupported and usually there for the benefit of the |
| 14 |
project/authors. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 18 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
Games Team |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Is your power animal a pengiun? |
Archives