Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:45:21
Message-Id: 200312091645.30207.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package by Seemant Kulleen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tuesday 09 December 2003 16:36, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
5 > 1. Should man-pages really belong in the base system (emerge system)?
6
7 yes
8
9 > 2. Which package's manpages should be preferred, assuming (as is correct
10 > to assume at least until portage-ng comes out) that portage has no
11 > conflicting-files-resolution feature?
12
13 whichever package provides the binary should provide the manpage
14 - -mike
15 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
16 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
17
18 iQIVAwUBP9ZCdkFjO5/oN/WBAQJ1zA/+M04SRrHtz5gFZXBsqulmcybTYiH9Unww
19 3yvrWJe/e2wBh1qkVubv0kYawPGbs88p/da5NN6PD8DfLxReiHvL2uVtU/sS3IRA
20 jUHHIQYH7MZygJnZ2kGVso1WAZwU/AU3arbVFpBiZjIdWzueEsZWoNMUiixf/DwI
21 ZhMizUA0QQNqF/mXlCtc/7ZbK037oSEC0A8AbKKQyHQ+DFrtqTC3kTcJpn1sYI6H
22 N837PSmXQ3AK3spGB8PCs8iFGR3E2hJRA6ZwsHOwPgwsxv1okQbSLzY4F7UVO1Bc
23 YsuD2zzpf+FtxtGoxJLvqV2JS4BNQmu3GVkxoOqMlnQP2V/PXboXx1nSwpAFvZuV
24 6PhuS8VVacvnaRdsm5v5X6MC498i7eRXUGSKYpcAIfS71istiCrQ+fWwaNh5lJz0
25 6lKbQoKmA2yoQzHUfjqurkcPqmVYxfICq+SV0iIioo9fR9rV2TFPtBx7cCb/K43M
26 nf7CsqABBsvOYkm5gy+w0FTGimSkal4gvkq4lJR6tYTANvoKGuMouNxmyWVyCU1M
27 ATDSfrnz3xoYp0o51kE35UcKfIR9T72xsmmLDpjNqtlAGhJGlsxI6Nzzem6lIIJf
28 pmhnfiAWsb+egyfg79tdfA0dhy4mIoLWmLztFV7H82bhKrphyZMO3sYx7lV1DdUD
29 A4p+MArDDSw=
30 =hwfP
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
32
33
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package Spider <spider@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>