| 1 |
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 7:52 pm, Gabriel Ebner wrote: |
| 2 |
> As a user I have to second this view. There are 37 ~amd64 keyword |
| 3 |
> bugs in bugzilla. (14 of them are from me and would only require |
| 4 |
> adding ~amd64 to the KEYWORDS.) The oldest simple bug (no replies) is |
| 5 |
> a week old. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
As a user, or anyone really, your expectations are a bit too high. Let's |
| 8 |
take one of the bugs you filed, for instance -- dev-util/darcs: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
...which depends on virtual/ghc (not currently available), wxhaskell (not |
| 11 |
currently available) which in turn depends on haddock (not currently |
| 12 |
available). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You're just in luck that I've been using darcs for the past week or so, and |
| 15 |
if I give it one more pass tonight, I will make those packages available. |
| 16 |
And as Ciaran pointed out, we don't blindly keyword packages just because |
| 17 |
they manage to compile. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Cheers, |
| 20 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 21 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives