| 1 |
On 08/07/14 19:17, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal... |
| 4 |
>> I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, but 1. |
| 5 |
>> and 2. should definately |
| 6 |
>> stay as is. |
| 7 |
> What authority does the game team have over anything? Did it get special |
| 8 |
> blessing from the Council? Isn't it just another regular project as per |
| 9 |
> GLEP 39? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not everything we have had since-always-standing is documented, |
| 15 |
unfortunately -- games has always been special from others |
| 16 |
Still, even if it's undocumented, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's like the amd64/x86 stabilization exception that everyone |
| 19 |
who can test them can mark them, "everyone" knew it existed |
| 20 |
but it wasn't documented properly |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Sure, we should drive to getting everything documented, to avoid |
| 23 |
thesekind of confusions with newer people... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
- Samuli |
Archives