| 1 |
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:55:54 +0300 |
| 2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 08/07/14 19:17, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal... |
| 8 |
> >> I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, |
| 9 |
> >> but 1. and 2. should definately |
| 10 |
> >> stay as is. |
| 11 |
> > What authority does the game team have over anything? Did it get |
| 12 |
> > special blessing from the Council? Isn't it just another regular |
| 13 |
> > project as per GLEP 39? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Not everything we have had since-always-standing is documented, |
| 16 |
> unfortunately -- games has always been special from others |
| 17 |
> Still, even if it's undocumented, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If it would have special blessing, it would be documented in one of the |
| 20 |
Council logs and/or summaries; that is about the only way it can receive |
| 21 |
it, apart from a large scale thread showing the same wide agreement. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> [...] confusions with newer people... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ironically; my first Portage tree action "add a directory" got a "don't |
| 26 |
throw [expletive] into [games category]" reply, before adding the ebuild. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
One really can't expect new people to start to address a team like |
| 29 |
that prior to addition; I've assumed for some time that contacting the |
| 30 |
teams is a necessity before addition of an ebuild, but that quickly |
| 31 |
turned out to be false for most if not all other teams. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
With kind regards, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 37 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 40 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 41 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives