Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Shaw <ryan.shaw@××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge: specifying an alternate portage tree
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 02:06:55
Message-Id: 20020519160207.3033d5d5.ryan.shaw@stanfordalumni.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge: specifying an alternate portage tree by Ed Heron
1 Thanks. I didn't notice that PORTDIR. That works for me.
2
3 Ed wrote:
4
5 > Well, when I grep for portage in make.globals, I see PORTDIR=/usr/portage.
6 > This implies that it is a settable parameter. You could set PORTDIR in any
7 > on the three config files, or theoretically in your environment. So, you
8 > could put it in make.conf. Of course, you could make /usr/portage a symlink
9 > to another place and swap your symlinks when you want to use a particular
10 > tree.
11 >
12 > ----- Original Message -----
13 > From: "Ryan Shaw" <ryan.shaw@××××××××××××××.org>
14 > To: <gentoo-dev@g.o>
15 > Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:36 AM
16 > Subject: [gentoo-dev] emerge: specifying an alternate portage tree
17 >
18 >
19 > > is there a way to tell emerge to use an alternate
20 > > portage tree?
21 > >
22 > > the reason i ask is that when i am working on
23 > > ebuilds i like to keep them out of my real portage
24 > > tree while i am working on them. i can use ebuild
25 > > to test them out, but when i've got builds with
26 > > interdependencies i'd like to do some testruns
27 > > with emerge without having to put the builds in
28 > > my real portage tree.
29 > >
30 > > ryan
31 > > _______________________________________________
32 > > gentoo-dev mailing list
33 > > gentoo-dev@g.o
34 > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
35 > >
36 >
37 > _______________________________________________
38 > gentoo-dev mailing list
39 > gentoo-dev@g.o
40 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev