1 |
Thanks. I didn't notice that PORTDIR. That works for me. |
2 |
|
3 |
Ed wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Well, when I grep for portage in make.globals, I see PORTDIR=/usr/portage. |
6 |
> This implies that it is a settable parameter. You could set PORTDIR in any |
7 |
> on the three config files, or theoretically in your environment. So, you |
8 |
> could put it in make.conf. Of course, you could make /usr/portage a symlink |
9 |
> to another place and swap your symlinks when you want to use a particular |
10 |
> tree. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ----- Original Message ----- |
13 |
> From: "Ryan Shaw" <ryan.shaw@××××××××××××××.org> |
14 |
> To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
15 |
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:36 AM |
16 |
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] emerge: specifying an alternate portage tree |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> > is there a way to tell emerge to use an alternate |
20 |
> > portage tree? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > the reason i ask is that when i am working on |
23 |
> > ebuilds i like to keep them out of my real portage |
24 |
> > tree while i am working on them. i can use ebuild |
25 |
> > to test them out, but when i've got builds with |
26 |
> > interdependencies i'd like to do some testruns |
27 |
> > with emerge without having to put the builds in |
28 |
> > my real portage tree. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > ryan |
31 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
32 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
33 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
34 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> |
37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
40 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |