| 1 |
Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:48 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Steven J. Long: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> Either way, I don't think the discussion about Changelogs should *at all* affect the move to git; |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Correct, because this wouldn't even be a regression to the current CVS |
| 8 |
>> workflow. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That depends a great deal on how the move is implemented. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I was more referring to the proposal of separating git commits from |
| 15 |
ChangeLogs which we don't even do now and I think is mostly pointless in |
| 16 |
the context of ebuilds. |
Archives