| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:48 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Steven J. Long: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Either way, I don't think the discussion about Changelogs should *at all* affect the move to git; |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Correct, because this wouldn't even be a regression to the current CVS |
| 7 |
> workflow. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That depends a great deal on how the move is implemented. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Most proposals involve dropping Changelogs from the tree, so devs |
| 13 |
would not write to them. Having Changelogs in the tree that users |
| 14 |
sync requires the creation of a script that will copy the git commit |
| 15 |
message into the Changelog. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If we continued to maintain Changelogs as text files in the git tree |
| 18 |
then there would not be any change in workflow. Devs would continue |
| 19 |
to use whatever scripts they're currently using to copy the commit |
| 20 |
message into the Changelog, or vice-versa. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives