| 1 |
On 6 March 2013 15:12, Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>: |
| 3 |
>> On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original |
| 5 |
>>> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more |
| 6 |
>>> in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at |
| 7 |
>>> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes |
| 8 |
>>> the whole task that much easier... |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as |
| 11 |
>> you said) — for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> -- |
| 16 |
>> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 17 |
>> flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I have no problem with the new category. We recently created a new |
| 22 |
category for the Qt packages which has around 20 packages in it, so I |
| 23 |
am not sure why Diego wants more than 100 packages for the new |
| 24 |
category. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 29 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives