1 |
2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>: |
2 |
> On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original |
4 |
>> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more |
5 |
>> in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at |
6 |
>> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes |
7 |
>> the whole task that much easier... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as |
10 |
> you said) — for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening. |
11 |
|
12 |
So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon. |
13 |
|
14 |
> -- |
15 |
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
16 |
> flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
17 |
> |