Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:12:37
Message-Id: CAB_KkxwDRMWACbhxU+kBhj2bQKCdKZvc3gu1tuZhvjMsFzdTpg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>:
2 > On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original
4 >> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more
5 >> in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at
6 >> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes
7 >> the whole task that much easier...
8 >
9 > I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as
10 > you said) — for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening.
11
12 So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon.
13
14 > --
15 > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
16 > flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
17 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>