1 |
2009-05-17 20:57:25 Robert Buchholz napisał(a): |
2 |
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) |
10 |
> > 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change |
11 |
> > 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension |
12 |
> > change |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Judging from this list, fourth option present in the GLEP is |
15 |
> unacceptable for you? |
16 |
> 4. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild |
17 |
|
18 |
+1 |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |