| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi Ciaran, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
| 7 |
| | Anyone objecting to change those dates from "dd-mon-yyyy" format to |
| 8 |
| | "yyyy-mm-dd"? |
| 9 |
| |
| 10 |
| I object. You're changing the GLEP process, and the way that that's |
| 11 |
| done is through another GLEP. Otherwise we'll end up with people |
| 12 |
It wouldn't change the GLEP process. It changes how we document a date |
| 13 |
information. |
| 14 |
| writing GLEPs following GLEP 1, and not realising that GLEP 1 is no |
| 15 |
| longer how things work. |
| 16 |
No, they'd have to follow GLEP 2, the GLEP Template... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
| Doing things properly wouldn't be difficult here. GLEP 43 took less |
| 19 |
| than half an hour. It's worth doing it for the sake of not confusing |
| 20 |
| future GLEP authors. |
| 21 |
I just change all date strings in all glep-xxxx.txt ... Nobody will be |
| 22 |
confused if he has a look into the template GLEP first. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Danny |
| 25 |
- -- |
| 26 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 27 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iD8DBQFDnzZVaVNL8NrtU6IRAnVWAJ9nGEEqRqv6D4CbGh1RLNPvVn8aygCgm1JE |
| 32 |
iqNotfEWrZQuqfVfSiBzGqI= |
| 33 |
=KyUu |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives