Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Lang <mwlang@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unstable branch proposal - second round
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:20:42
Message-Id: 5.1.0.14.2.20020416180627.02c7eeb0@mail.cybrains.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unstable branch proposal - second round by Brent Cook
1 Yeah, pretty much. However, Freshports looks more developer centrix than
2 end-user
3 centric as Freshmeat appears to me.
4
5 I think it is important to keep the end user who's going to be trying to
6 make intelligent decisions about which ebuilds to download as your central
7 audience.
8
9 At 04:09 PM 3/16/2002 -0600, you wrote:
10 > > The beauty of this? Those familiar with Freshmeat barely have to learn a
11 > > new interface and the whole Freshmeat site has *got* to be open source
12 > > available somewhere to make this a fast start towards this sort of vision.
13 > >
14 >
15 >Do you essentially mean http://www.freshports.org/ with comments?
16 >
17 >_______________________________________________
18 >gentoo-dev mailing list
19 >gentoo-dev@g.o
20 >http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
21
22 President
23 www.cybrains.net
24
25 "All things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" -- Albert Einstein

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unstable branch proposal - second round George Shapovalov <georges@×××××××××××.edu>