| 1 |
Chris++ |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |
| 4 |
wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:50 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Do you think that the differences between the proportion of patches |
| 8 |
> > from 'Paludis people' that are accepted or rejected and the proportion |
| 9 |
> > of patches from 'Portage people' or 'Pkgcore people' indicates a |
| 10 |
> > problem? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Nope. What I see as a problem is that the primary author and current |
| 13 |
> de facto maintainer is so much of an asshole that he was forcibly |
| 14 |
> removed from the Gentoo project, which PMS is supposed to be written |
| 15 |
> for, and has ostracized (at least) one of the package manager's |
| 16 |
> development team with his constant not-so-subtle attacks. Quite |
| 17 |
> frankly, I'd prefer see Gentoo take control over the specification that |
| 18 |
> defines the most important single feature of Gentoo and remove the |
| 19 |
> non-Gentoo developers from its development. No offense, but you're not |
| 20 |
> a Gentoo developer any longer and you shouldn't have a say in how *we* |
| 21 |
> manage ourselves. You're more than welcome to contribute code, fork, or |
| 22 |
> whatever the hell you want. This is open source, after all, but that |
| 23 |
> doesn't mean you should be allowed to hold the position of power over |
| 24 |
> Gentoo that you've been granted. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Chris Gianelloni |
| 28 |
> Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 29 |
> Games Developer |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Mauricio Lima Pilla |
| 36 |
Polytechnic Center - UCPEL |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
pilla@××××××××××.br, mauricio.pilla@×××××.com |
| 39 |
http://g3pd.ucpel.tche.br/~pilla |
| 40 |
key 0x37705BE0 |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
"I'm just very selective about the reality I choose to accept." |
| 43 |
-- Calvin |
Archives