1 |
Wernfried Haas wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:21:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > So the only important question is whether the news items are useful for |
4 |
> > the people who will see them. In this case we know the answer is yes. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> No one answered my question asked in Message-ID: |
7 |
> <20070505090630.GA14287@×××××××××.rechner> what paludis actually does |
8 |
> in case it encounters a config file using the old syntax so far, but |
9 |
> as long it doesn't break the system, it doesn't need a news item. |
10 |
> GLEP 42 talks about critical, really important news, not just useful |
11 |
> ones. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Imho the whole GLEP process is being abused to define some scenario to |
14 |
> get the support for news, and then push it through for stuff way |
15 |
> outside the boundaries defined in the GLEP. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> cheers, |
18 |
> Wernfried |
19 |
|
20 |
That's the point. |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |