| 1 |
On 2014-09-17 14:20, vivo75@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> Il 17/09/2014 14:09, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> The bc utility is part of the posix tools and it might be used to build |
| 6 |
> >> linux among the other stuff. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Luca, |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > bc is not in the system set and is a dependency of the kernel or any |
| 11 |
> > other package that needs it, so why do we need to include a package |
| 12 |
> > that takes ~20 seconds to build? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Most people don't use the ebuild for the kernel |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's a rather outrageous and difficult to substantiate claim. Given |
| 17 |
what I've seen in the forums and on IRC, it would appear the reverse |
| 18 |
is true; most people use the ebuild for the kernel. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I wouldn't consider people who deviate from the supported methods as |
| 21 |
our concern. If you're smart enough to do that and want to make your |
| 22 |
own path, you're smart enough to emerge bc. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 27 |
PostgreSQL Herd Bull |
| 28 |
Email : titanofold@g.o |
| 29 |
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0 |
| 30 |
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0 |
Archives