Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:10:54
Message-Id: 1075108037.13477.11.camel@green
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme by Blake Matheny
1 > The builds that I feel should be moved to dev-scheme are: dev-lisp/plt,
2 > dev-lisp/kawa, dev-lisp/mzscheme, dev-lisp/bigloo, dev-lisp/gauche,
3 > dev-lisp/drscheme, dev-lisp/chicken, dev-lisp/mit-scheme and dev-util/guile.
4 > There may be others that I have missed, (Matt, anything?). Guile has the most
5 > dependencies, with around 34 of them. There may be some debate as to whether
6 > or not guile should be moved, but as guile is a Scheme interpreter I think
7 > it's appropriate.
8
9 We seem to have difficulties being consistent in this area, but actual
10 language compilers / interpreters really belong in dev-lang (for
11 example, python is in dev-lang, while python extensions and libraries
12 are located in dev-python).
13
14 Best,
15 g2boojum
16 --
17 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme Blake Matheny <jake@g.o>