Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing (was Re: package graveyard)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:02:22
Message-Id: 1313661697.4150.57.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] package graveyard by "Rémi Cardona"
1 Il giorno mer, 17/08/2011 alle 23.20 +0200, Rémi Cardona ha scritto:
2 >
3 > If anything, working on tinderboxes to catch build issues early and
4 > file
5 > bugs against packages, _that_ would help to clean up cruft from
6 > portage.
7
8 Maintainers can help that by making sure that src_test is not wasting
9 useless time running non-tests, false positives, or code deemed to
10 failure.
11
12 Also, make sure that packages do not collide/block just for the sake of
13 doing so. If they provide binaries with the same name and functionality,
14 consider making them eselectable, or rename one of them.. if they have
15 the same name and do different stuff, get one (or both) upstream to
16 understand that the name is too generic, or already taken, and rename
17 the file once and for all.
18
19 Thank you all,
20
21 --
22 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
23 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Tinderboxing (was Re: package graveyard) "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>