Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:21:40
Message-Id: 1235042497.23302.21.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) by Ulrich Mueller
1 Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 10:37 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
2 > >>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
3 >
4 > > Instead of breaking things you could have tried to come up with a
5 > > real solution.
6 >
7 > This could be said about the council's decision as well.
8 >
9 Right. Two seconds after the council meeting every user got a broken
10 tree because we blindly removed prepalldocs.
11 Or, wait, removing prepalldocs wouldn't break anything and we didn't.
12
13 --
14 -------------------------------------------------------
15 Tiziano Müller
16 Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
17 Areas of responsibility:
18 Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin
19 E-Mail : dev-zero@g.o
20 GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature