Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:37:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | 18845.10309.207236.485876@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) by "Tiziano Müller" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Instead of breaking things you could have tried to come up with a |
| 4 | > real solution. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This could be said about the council's decision as well. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > [1] |
| 9 | > src_install() { |
| 10 | > emake DESTDIR="${D}" docdir="/usr/share/doc/${PF}" |
| 11 | > prepalldocs |
| 12 | > } |
| 13 | > (or similar) |
| 14 | > will change to: |
| 15 | > src_install() { |
| 16 | > emake DESTDIR="${D}" docdir="${T}/doc" |
| 17 | > dodoc "${T}/doc" |
| 18 | > } |
| 19 | |
| 20 | This will not work. dodoc operates only on files, not on directories. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Besides, what do we win by this unnecessary copying? |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) | "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o> |