Archives
Archives
| From: | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:47:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 8b4c83ad0902190147gf995cfar8a0ba27f99f4117c@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 3 | > This will not work. dodoc operates only on files, not on directories. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Tiziano mentioned that later in the email. Perhaps you missed it? He |
| 7 | proposed allowing dodoc to apply on directories as well. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > Besides, what do we win by this unnecessary copying? |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | |
| 12 | What copying? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | ~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |