| 1 |
2010/1/2 Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es>: |
| 2 |
> [...] I failed to see if, finally, an approval |
| 3 |
> from the council is needed for merging [multilib] to portage-2.2 or not |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The only approval that's required to merge anything to an official |
| 6 |
portage branch is Zac's (zmedico). He may have to follow some rules |
| 7 |
and wait for some vote from the council when for example EAPIs are |
| 8 |
concerned but whether to merge code or not is his decision and |
| 9 |
responsibility. That said I've never seen him refusing to merge |
| 10 |
anything that was worth it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> if [multilib] will be discussed finally on this meeting. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Technically we don't need to (I'll explain that in another email) but |
| 15 |
we may. I'm just starting to work on the agenda for the 18th and I |
| 16 |
don't have everything in place yet. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Denis. |
Archives