| 1 |
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 20:32, Mark Bainter wrote: |
| 2 |
> Except that it still only reflects a few people's opinion. Unless you have |
| 3 |
> the overwhelming support of the community that a particular filesystem is |
| 4 |
> bad news |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yeah right. There obviously are people that have problems with xfs (and as you |
| 7 |
can see JMS said there was JFS that you could use, I gave an example about it |
| 8 |
not being stable and some others joined in though _he_ would recommend it... |
| 9 |
You're probably right to leave the fs part out completely. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> The reason is that then you have to track that. You have to watch its |
| 12 |
> development and remember to go back and change it all in the documentation |
| 13 |
> later when it gets fixed up...or disappears from active development. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yeah thats too true. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Alex |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety |
| 22 |
deserve neither liberty nor safety." |
| 23 |
Benjamin Franklin |
Archives