| 1 |
El mié, 20-06-2012 a las 23:43 +0200, Justin escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400 |
| 4 |
> > Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support |
| 6 |
> >> The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly |
| 7 |
> >> when a user does not want to upgrade something. I had this problem |
| 8 |
> >> with WINE and glibc because I wanted to avoid the reverse memcpy() |
| 9 |
> >> fiasco on my systems. This situation would have been avoided entirely |
| 10 |
> >> if the package manager supported multilib. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > This one's unlikely to happen unless someone's prepared to put in the |
| 13 |
> > work. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Tommy worked a lot on this and he asked for help to bring his |
| 16 |
> proposal/spec/glep into shape. |
| 17 |
> We are all aware what this is all about and know that anybody who is |
| 18 |
> using multilib would benefit. |
| 19 |
> Can't you simply work with him together to get it into what you expect |
| 20 |
> it to be instead of pointing out that it isn't? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Also, if I remember correctly, Tommy asked for this some months ago, you |
| 24 |
asked for what he sent some days ago and now you require more and more |
| 25 |
work to delay things to be implemented. I also don't understand why |
| 26 |
Gentoo is forced to stick with old ways of doing things until new EAPI |
| 27 |
is approved while Exherbo is free to implement and use things like that |
| 28 |
special way of handling DEPENDENCIES without waiting for any EAPI to be |
| 29 |
accepted... or maybe I am wrong and people is able to use any PM manager |
| 30 |
compliant with EAPI on exherbo without issues? |
Archives