| 1 |
Steve Dibb wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dominique Michel wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will |
| 5 |
>> include |
| 6 |
>> both religious and scientific softwares. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is |
| 9 |
> herdless once again. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It's interesting that people are up in arms once again (like they didn't |
| 12 |
read the old thread) about putting a package into a herd -- read the |
| 13 |
category name; it's not sci-anything, it's app-misc. Just about any herd |
| 14 |
would do. Usually the developers don't like packages that are herdless |
| 15 |
for all the usual maintenance reasons. I mean, at least it's got a |
| 16 |
maintainer (beandog in this case). But it's gotten no love from any of |
| 17 |
the sci-* herds; it doesn't seem to be wanted. So what's the big problem |
| 18 |
of sticking it into a herd somewhere, a herd that seems to be maintained |
| 19 |
by just one person (beandog in this case)? |
Archives