Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: John Mylchreest <johnm@g.o>
To: Brad House <brad_mssw@g.o>
Cc: Mental Patient <mental@××××××××××.com>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module?
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:40:10
Message-Id: 1076866786.452.1.camel@johnm.willow.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module? by Brad House
1 I have also updated the bug on bugzilla.
2 Although it is badly written ;) it should update you on the situation.
3
4 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41670
5
6 On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 17:28, Brad House wrote:
7 > gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.2 should be fine ...
8 > 2.6.3_rc2 is not happy.
9 > I do not know what gentoo-test-sources is ...
10 >
11 > This is also a problem in vanilla, and not an issue
12 > with the patches applied by gentoo-dev-sources.
13 >
14 > -Brad
15 >
16 > > Forgive me if this is the wrong list, but I seem to be having a problem
17 > > with the ieee driver in the latest version of gentoo-dev-sources
18 > > (2.6.3_rc2).
19 > >
20 > > I'd been running the stable (2.6.1-rc1) version for a while. I was
21 > > having problems getting a couple usb devices working (Canon digital
22 > > camera and Nomad jukebox). I'd heard on gentoo-user that upgrading to
23 > > 2.6.2 had resolved this issue for someone else. When I tried to get
24 > > 2.6.2 via gentoo-test-sources, it was masked. Setting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS
25 > > didnt help, so thats when I upgraded gentoo-dev-sources.
26 > >
27 > > My issue with the usb devices is resolved. Everything works great.
28 > > However, on boot hotplug tried to load the ieee1394 module. Currently I
29 > > dont have any firewire devices or anything that uses the port, so I've
30 > > removed support from the kernel to work around the oops. But this used
31 > > to work in 2.6.1-rc1. Or at least it didnt used to oops :)
32 > >
33 > > Anyways, this is an FYI in case no one has mentioned it. The port in
34 > > question is on a creative labs audigy. The stack trace is below. If this
35 > > is something I should take upstream to lkml, let me know. I'm just not
36 > > sure if its a vanilla kernel problem or a gentoo post patch issue.
37 > >
38 > >
39 > > Thanks for your consideration. If there are any other details I can
40 > > provide, let me know. I've only been using gentoo for a couple months so
41 > > I'm not sure of proceedure in many cases.
42 > >
43 > >
44 > >
45 > > ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[00023c00200083aa]
46 > > Badness in kobject_get at lib/kobject.c:431
47 > > Call Trace:
48 > > [<c022e0dc>] kobject_get+0x4c/0x50
49 > > [<c02846a8>] get_device+0x18/0x30
50 > > [<c0285323>] bus_for_each_dev+0x63/0xc0
51 > > [<f890861d>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x4d/0x130 [ieee1394]
52 > > [<f89084e0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
53 > > [<f8908a79>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x179/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
54 > > [<f8908900>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
55 > > [<c0109289>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
56 > >
57 > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address b828ec83
58 > > printing eip:
59 > > b828ec83
60 > > *pde = 00000000
61 > > Oops: 0000 [#1]
62 > > CPU: 0
63 > > EIP: 0060:[<b828ec83>] Not tainted
64 > > EFLAGS: 00010282
65 > > EIP is at 0xb828ec83
66 > > eax: b828ec83 ebx: f8914c04 ecx: f754df9c edx: 00000000
67 > > esi: f8907ee0 edi: 00000000 ebp: f8906bb0 esp: f754df40
68 > > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
69 > > Process knodemgrd_0 (pid: 3443, threadinfo=f754c000 task=f7998040)
70 > > Stack: c022e178 f8914c04 f8914be0 f8914be8 f8914b40 f7438044 c0285340
71 > > f8914c04
72 > > f754df9c f8914b8c 00000000 f743803c f754df9c f760d3d8 f754df9c
73 > > f890861d
74 > > f8914b40 f743803c f754df9c f89084e0 f7534000 f760d3d8 f7534000
75 > > f760d3d8
76 > > Call Trace:
77 > > [<c022e178>] kobject_cleanup+0x98/0xa0
78 > > [<c0285340>] bus_for_each_dev+0x80/0xc0
79 > > [<f890861d>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x4d/0x130 [ieee1394]
80 > > [<f89084e0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
81 > > [<f8908a79>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x179/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
82 > > [<f8908900>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x1a0 [ieee1394]
83 > > [<c0109289>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
84 > >
85 > > Code: Bad EIP value.
86 > > <6>eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability
87 > > of 45e1.
88 > > blk: queue f7dd6a00, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
89 > > blk: queue f7dd6600, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
90 > > blk: queue f7dcaa00, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
91 > > svc: unknown version (3)
92 > > request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- char-major-226-0. error = 256
93 > >
94 > >
95 > >
96 > > --
97 > > Mental (Mental@××××××××××.com)
98 > >
99 > > Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum.
100 > >
101 > > GPG public key: http://www.neverlight.com/pas/Mental.asc
102 > >
103 > >
104 > > --
105 > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
106 > >
107 > >
108 > >
109 >
110 >
111 > --
112 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
113 --
114 Regards
115 John Mylchreest
116
117 Gentoo Linux: http://www.gentoo.org
118 Public Key: gpg --recv-keys 0xEAB9E721
119 Key fingerprint: 0670 E5E4 F461 806B 860A 2245 A40E 72EB EAB9 E721
120 Web: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEAB9E721

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-sources bug in ieee1394 module? Mental <Mental@××××××××××.com>