| 1 |
And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,as I |
| 2 |
see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of |
| 3 |
developers. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
2010/6/3 Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> El jue, 03-06-2010 a las 13:36 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 8 |
> > For the record, media-optical herd is currently without any devs and |
| 9 |
> > also the mail alias in d.g.o is empty so nobody is really reading the |
| 10 |
> > bugmail. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > In case you want to join it... |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > - Samuli |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Would be possible to modify script that generates |
| 17 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml to list |
| 18 |
> empty herds on a different section at the top of the webpage for |
| 19 |
> detecting herds without people easier? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Even better would be to also provide information about "devway" |
| 22 |
> developers, indicating something like, for example: |
| 23 |
> 41. gnome |
| 24 |
> - Description |
| 25 |
> GNOME Desktop and related packages |
| 26 |
> - Herd maintainers' email address |
| 27 |
> gnome@g.o |
| 28 |
> - Maintainers |
| 29 |
> ... |
| 30 |
> pacho@g.o (Pacho Ramos) (Devway) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> But I am not sure if it would be possible :-/ |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Also, maybe we should consider change the assignment for bugs assigned |
| 35 |
> to empty herds, assigning them to maintainers-needed and CCing affected |
| 36 |
> herd, that way, once somebody revives the herd, he could simply revert |
| 37 |
> the assign to the old way and, until then, people reviewing |
| 38 |
> maintainers-needed bugs would also notice that bug reports. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Thanks a lot |
| 41 |
> |
Archives