| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:21:35PM -0500, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 2 |
> I personally feel that it may be a good time to reconsider making |
| 3 |
> gentoo-core a publicly read-only list. Several users I know (some |
| 4 |
> personally) are irate that we appear to be a "behind-closed-doors" |
| 5 |
> project. Yes, this stems from the recent fork announcement. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> gentoo-core is where we do our planning, discuss management structure, |
| 8 |
> discuss technical questions (of which we already try to CC gentoo-dev |
| 9 |
> out of courtesy) and architecture issues. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I hope that we can open -core as a publicly read-only list to involve |
| 12 |
> our community more. We owe this much to our user-base in my opinion. |
| 13 |
> For these reasons, I have CC'd this to -dev. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Matt |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We've already gone over the reasons -core should remain private |
| 19 |
(discussing security before it goes public and personal information). I |
| 20 |
think that a better approach would be to enforce a policy of all |
| 21 |
technical stuff and anything that isn't sensitive being discussed on |
| 22 |
-dev rather than -core. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 27 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives