1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
5 |
> hmm, I'm just thinking about splitting the tree into separate |
6 |
> (larger) parts, actually: move out certain subtrees to an overlay. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> For example: KDE. |
9 |
> Many people/systems won't ever use it (ie. have no X at all). |
10 |
> Others are very interested in it. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If we had this whole subtree in an overlay, it would make the main |
13 |
> tree much, much smaller, so easier to maintain and save load from |
14 |
> the mirrors. |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't see how this is going to make anything easier to maintain. |
17 |
I maintain a separate part (different from KDE) of the tree and I simply |
18 |
just avoid doing "cd kde-*" when I'm doing stuff in the tree (I simply |
19 |
just forget it is there) :-) |
20 |
In the rare case that my actions require that I actually look at kde |
21 |
stuff, then it would be a pain in the ass if I had to get it from |
22 |
somewhere else, and not have it right at hand. |
23 |
|
24 |
The above of course only holds if the tree is structured in a good way, |
25 |
which I think it is (to a large degree, one can always find special cases). |
26 |
|
27 |
And an argument along the lines of "the tree is too large to download" |
28 |
does not apply either. If one cannot sync the tree over his/hers |
29 |
internet connection, then one can clearly not download gcc either :-) |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Martin R. Ehmsen |
33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
34 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) |
35 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
36 |
|
37 |
iD8DBQFE4wQloCiIG96jYfYRAh4iAKDVA9HYS1oSDj8hgvH9kvQBMbBbpACdFIAH |
38 |
2ypo9/R5xGLzC6D1dIMjM4Q= |
39 |
=ROAN |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |