| 1 |
I'snt the idea of creating a new mailing list to let gentoo-dev be mesy?, |
| 2 |
in that case we could simply redirect all non-aproved posts from gen-int to |
| 3 |
gen-dev. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
/EKG |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 23 May 2017 22:04, "Kent Fredric" <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 21:31:18 +0200 |
| 10 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > - public (open subscription), initially we may optionally copy all |
| 13 |
> > subscribers from gentoo-dev so that they do not miss discussion, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What would be the result if somebody replied to a g-dev-internal ML |
| 16 |
> without permission? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I think there should be something in place other than sending it |
| 19 |
> to /dev/null , but I can't think of any good approach that doesn't make |
| 20 |
> g-dev messier as a result. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
Archives