Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:50:37
Message-Id: 20111011194948.GZ704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild by Samuli Suominen
1 On 11-10-2011 22:38:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 > This document should be fixed. Any comments about the patches belong to
3 > header of those patches, available for possible upstreams as well.
4 > Doesn't belong to ebuilds.
5
6 The devmanual doesn't suggest this is the way to go, does it?
7
8 > So it very rarely makes sense to call epatch multiple times, and
9 > certainly doesn't improve maintainability.
10
11 Conclusion doesn't follow from argumentation.
12
13
14 --
15 Fabian Groffen
16 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies