| 1 |
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:29:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 |
| 3 |
> Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Please, hard mask beta versions. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. |
| 8 |
> If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version |
| 9 |
> changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due to |
| 10 |
> it, then I would agree. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I don't know or use this package, but I agree. Just because something |
| 13 |
is beta doesn't mean it should be automatically hard masked. That |
| 14 |
decision should be left to the maintainer. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
William |
Archives