From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | pva@g.o, jer@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild | ||
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:30:57 | ||
Message-Id: | 20101029192907.0c1d0874@pomiocik.lan | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild by Peter Volkov |
1 | On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 |
2 | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Please, hard mask beta versions. |
5 | |
6 | I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. |
7 | If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version |
8 | changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due to |
9 | it, then I would agree. |
10 | |
11 | Please notice that 'beta' is not the same for each upstream. There are |
12 | indeed packages which are in 'beta' state for the time being -- would |
13 | you like all of them to be hard masked? Or maybe you're fine with them |
14 | because they don't put 'beta' in their PV? |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Best regards, |
18 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> |