Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: pva@g.o, jer@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:30:57
Message-Id: 20101029192907.0c1d0874@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild by Peter Volkov
1 On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400
2 Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Please, hard mask beta versions.
5
6 I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that.
7 If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version
8 changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due to
9 it, then I would agree.
10
11 Please notice that 'beta' is not the same for each upstream. There are
12 indeed packages which are in 'beta' state for the time being -- would
13 you like all of them to be hard masked? Or maybe you're fine with them
14 because they don't put 'beta' in their PV?
15
16 --
17 Best regards,
18 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies