| 1 |
On 14 Feb 2016 15:56, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2/14/16 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 14 Feb 2016 15:42, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 2/14/16 3:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> that's not true, nor is it the central criticism, imo. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > can you list the projects that utilize eudev ? the repo doesn't |
| 10 |
> > that i can see. it is the central criticism imo when correct |
| 11 |
> > interaction with other projects is key. people rely on rules being |
| 12 |
> > parsed & run correctly, as well as information provided by udev |
| 13 |
> > matching what they are running/testing everyday. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> until patrick brought up the list of distros, i was only aware of |
| 16 |
> alpine which is a musl based distro. then puppy and slack came |
| 17 |
> forward. they build their entire system using eudev as the libudev |
| 18 |
> provider. if there were issues, they would bring forward bug reports |
| 19 |
> like any other project. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> so when you say "people rely on rules being parsed ..." i don't know |
| 22 |
> why those user bases are dismissed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i'm not dismissing them per-se. i'm being practical here: i think you |
| 25 |
can agree that the combined developer base of alpine/puppy/slack(ware?) |
| 26 |
is significantly smaller as compared to the distros using udev. |
| 27 |
-mike |
Archives