Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:57:14
Message-Id: 56C0EA0F.20802@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Mike Frysinger
1 On 2/14/16 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On 14 Feb 2016 15:42, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
3 >> On 2/14/16 3:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 >>> eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it.
5 >>
6 >> that's not true, nor is it the central criticism, imo.
7 >
8 > can you list the projects that utilize eudev ? the repo doesn't
9 > that i can see. it is the central criticism imo when correct
10 > interaction with other projects is key. people rely on rules being
11 > parsed & run correctly, as well as information provided by udev
12 > matching what they are running/testing everyday. -mike
13 >
14
15 until patrick brought up the list of distros, i was only aware of
16 alpine which is a musl based distro. then puppy and slack came
17 forward. they build their entire system using eudev as the libudev
18 provider. if there were issues, they would bring forward bug reports
19 like any other project.
20
21 so when you say "people rely on rules being parsed ..." i don't know
22 why those user bases are dismissed.
23
24 --
25 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
26 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
27 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
28 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
29 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Alex McWhirter <alexmcwhirter@×××××××.us>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>