| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Corentin Chary <iksaif@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò |
| 3 |
> <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix |
| 6 |
>>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess new upstream |
| 7 |
>>> versions (strange mangling rules, unbrowsable directories, etc...). |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Yes I guess Jeroen was just saying why we shouldn't abandon it as Gilles |
| 10 |
>> proposed. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> FWIW for the rest it feels right to me. Although this starts to add up |
| 13 |
>> to the reasons why at least metadata.xml should be validated by schema, |
| 14 |
>> and not DTD. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Maybe .. We plan to use <watch xmlns="http://euscan.iksaif.net"> to |
| 17 |
> avoid editing metadata.dtd (for now). |
| 18 |
> What do you think about format propositions ? Current format looks |
| 19 |
> like what was given in the examples, but mgorny feels that something |
| 20 |
> more xmlish would be better. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If you want metadata.dtd patched; please file a bug against www@ and |
| 23 |
someone will look at it (you may have to poke us a few times... ;)) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Corentin Chary |
| 28 |
> http://xf.iksaif.net |
| 29 |
> |
Archives