| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò |
| 2 |
<flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix |
| 5 |
>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess new upstream |
| 6 |
>> versions (strange mangling rules, unbrowsable directories, etc...). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yes I guess Jeroen was just saying why we shouldn't abandon it as Gilles |
| 9 |
> proposed. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> FWIW for the rest it feels right to me. Although this starts to add up |
| 12 |
> to the reasons why at least metadata.xml should be validated by schema, |
| 13 |
> and not DTD. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Maybe .. We plan to use <watch xmlns="http://euscan.iksaif.net"> to |
| 16 |
avoid editing metadata.dtd (for now). |
| 17 |
What do you think about format propositions ? Current format looks |
| 18 |
like what was given in the examples, but mgorny feels that something |
| 19 |
more xmlish would be better. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Corentin Chary |
| 23 |
http://xf.iksaif.net |
Archives