| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:25:58 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:21:42 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > So... what is your issue in here, sir? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The issue is what Zac, Ian and I were discussing, before you jumped in |
| 9 |
> and started yelling. Repeating it for you: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> We want to know, for dependencies that are in DEPEND and not RDEPEND, |
| 12 |
> whether or not most of them will become HDEPENDs, if dependencies are |
| 13 |
> being expressed properly. If that is the case, then it makes more |
| 14 |
> sense to introduce TDEPEND than HDEPEND. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The only person yelling here is you. I have politely asked a question, |
| 17 |
and then you come with your wisdom not answering it at all. And if you |
| 18 |
haven't noticed, my question was directed to Ian who -- unlike you -- |
| 19 |
may be able to say something meaningful in the topic rather than |
| 20 |
diverging from it just to prove a random point only you know. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives