1 |
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009 à 20:55 +0000, Duncan a écrit : |
2 |
> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> posted |
3 |
> eafa4c130903191112t50cef619l1a2eeb8c45898e7b@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
4 |
> below, on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:12:15 -0500: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Unless someone has some better ideas for a reasonable default. (IMHO, |
7 |
> > removing all of PolicyKit is a reasonable default but it looks like |
8 |
> > going forward GNOME is just using it without really any documentation or |
9 |
> > any forethought into the real world implications of PolicyKit and the |
10 |
> > inherent support/issues with ConsoleKit) |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Just asking, can the following be made to avoid #4 in the following |
13 |
> sequence with policykit, now? It used to be a terrible issue with |
14 |
> consolekit or whatever it was called. Or is that still one of the |
15 |
> problems? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> 1. Boot to a VT. |
18 |
> 2. Login at VT. |
19 |
> 3. startx by sourcing a script that logs out of the VT after the startx, |
20 |
> as that login is now unneeded. |
21 |
> 4. Have sound and various other device permissions break as there's no |
22 |
> active login, despite X and all its apps otherwise running normally. |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
could you report a bug ? I've been discussing with diego about issues |
26 |
with where pam_ck_connector is placed in our pam stack having someone |
27 |
with a real problem with how things are today would probably help to |
28 |
iron out this once and for all. Also you might want to try |
29 |
consolekit-0.3 (and especially read the elog messages). |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
33 |
Gentoo |