Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:11:23
Message-Id: 4281BE34.9020108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Brian Harring schrieb:
5 > for dev-lang/icc-6.0-r1
6 > l_cc_p_6.0.139.tar isn't fetchable
7 >
8 > and for
9 > dev-lang/icc-7.1.029
10 > l_cc_pc_7.1.029.tar isn't fetchable
11 >
12 > and....
13 > dev-lang/ifc-6.0
14 > l_fc_p_6.0.140.tar isn't fetchable.
15
16 Fine, fine.... this means i can remove them as soon as i pout the new
17 versions in :-) I'm now going to package mask all of icc/ifc.
18 Thanks Brian!
19
20 > These fetching failures are the only reason I even noticed xtv was
21 > gone, and the ebuilds have begun collecting a fair amount of open bugs
22 I've only noticed around 10, are the probably even more ?
23
24 Danny
25 - --
26 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
27 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
30
31 iD8DBQFCgb40aVNL8NrtU6IRAvCXAJsE42wpWJBiWJjzCMt0dNVDyfldsgCfeJwO
32 /uR0AdiBEsVEq/rALrqt1AA=
33 =lSBV
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies