| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:18, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Ok, if EAPI 2 turns on src_test except where explicitly overridden by |
| 5 |
>> the ebuild, explain how EAPI 2 src_test failures are meaningless in the |
| 6 |
>> same way that EAPI 0/1 src_test failures are. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Test failures aren't meaningless right now. Applications with good test |
| 9 |
> suites got them used by the people that cares already. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you care about tests now, how do you know if foo.ebuild failed its |
| 12 |
src_test because there's a problem or if src_test failed because no |
| 13 |
one else has ever run it with test in FEATURES? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also, I think you seem to be suggesting that gentoo is so well tested |
| 16 |
that once something's marked stable, there's no point in testing it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Richard Brown |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives