Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:59:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 2462869.Cdz0UZGzAf@porto | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
||
| 1 | Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017, 04:44:58 CEST schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > How about no foundation. Not even a legal entity. No certifications |
| 4 | > from vendors, nor for employees. No one to hire for official support. |
| 5 | > There are so many things far beyond anything having to do with a stable |
| 6 | > tree or not. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I was *this* close to nominaing you for Trustee, until I realized you're not |
| 9 | even a foundation member... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 13 | dilfridge@g.o |
| 14 | Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |