| 1 |
On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> If I understand the process correctly, spb et al are writing their best |
| 3 |
> vision of an ebuild spec, while trying to strike a reasonable |
| 4 |
> compromise between what portage does and what it should be doing, but |
| 5 |
> once they're done it's going to be submitted to the Council and the |
| 6 |
> community to be analyzed, commented upon, and accepted in part, in |
| 7 |
> whole, or not at all by the Council. If they take too long, or their |
| 8 |
> work is too paludis-biased, or if people just don't trust the authors, |
| 9 |
> then nothing is preventing anybody else from writing a competing spec. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I actually know so, but as it seems that much work to write, it is quite a |
| 12 |
hurdle for someone else to step up with an alternative. It might be tempting |
| 13 |
to ignore a bias. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Paul |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 19 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 20 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 21 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives