| 1 |
tigger@g.o wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:23:27PM +0000, tigger@g.o wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>sorry, replied only to Caleb by mistake the first time... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> oh ffs. how lame am I. Didn't include my reply... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Sorry folks, not enough coffee this morning... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>The FHS 2.3 will be released soon. Some of the more controversial ideas stem |
| 13 |
>>from the addition of /srv and /media to the root filesystem. Debian recently |
| 14 |
>>put out some feelers to get an opinion on how they wanted to address these |
| 15 |
>>proposed changes. I suggest Gentoo does the same. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> While I don't care either way about /media (whats wrong with /mnt?) I |
| 19 |
> think /srv is a great idea. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think /var/www and /var/lib/mysql are candidates for being moved for a |
| 22 |
> start. You should be able to wipe /var without breaking your system, |
| 23 |
> just logs and re-creatable caches. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Wouldn't portage then need to be modified? From what I understand, /var/cache/edb/world |
| 26 |
can't be reliably regenerated with the same results. More importantly, what about /var/db/pkg? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Andrew Gaffney |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives