1 |
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 10:09:42 -0400 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Maybe in these cases the PM should make it more clear that |
5 |
> there was an alternative option. |
6 |
|
7 |
Yes, Portage could also be helped out with some output improvements. |
8 |
|
9 |
It requires an analysis on its own, among the kind of collecting "bad |
10 |
non understandable output" and the solution to it; then try to make up |
11 |
"favorable output" for it. After which it has to be seen if the needed |
12 |
information can be obtained, as well as the algorithms for that |
13 |
favorable output can be implemented. |
14 |
|
15 |
Somewhere in that flow we also need to have some kind of quality review |
16 |
cycle to see if the "favorable output" helps; otherwise, it could make |
17 |
the situation worse instead of better. |
18 |
|
19 |
Because, really, ... |
20 |
|
21 |
http://bpaste.net/raw/Pp9Iv18ehzzHKVbm4Sbe/ |
22 |
|
23 |
... does not give away upower as a root blocker cause; even going |
24 |
further than that, it doesn't suggest upower-pm-utils as an alternative. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
With kind regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
30 |
Gentoo Developer |
31 |
|
32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |